彝
This une clearly a grou
beach of the Rejectations:
ما
hit as the whole story is so
I agree
state & out of date
with In follies that a severe censure
should suffice.
heban? Telegraph that the facts as reported tires
do not unrraut dismissal and that Havele
should be at severely exceruered & reinstated.
And in drafting to the given explain that' the cave, a fact from its actiquity, was not
of
the wout
of it
it kind
- as the
agreement
entend into betören Howell & Talam suggen
intention
that the forever had no of eating personally into linde or undertaking any obligations which would interfere with
destin
A
hie
public servant : unfrbinately, as
events turned out, he did personally engage in
the truseviews to an
unurrrstäble extent &
he must be reverely censured.
(this rearm
[ you will note think Tulžen
Jays
T.C.K. 14/1
he is bringing
this
76
Su I Ashwood (on the facts as stated)
Jafree that the punishment is
much too
Leveie
@
J
would
be
M'Collins
inclined to proved
purposes. My only difficulty in
that the pending
V Howell may
on
the
action
Tatam of
throw frether light
matter
It is perhaps
unlikely, but suffering it were
shown that Howell had taken
active Share in the busines "let" (not-sold) to Tuen
CAT
after it was
Cheong
+ af the it passed
to Tang
Kee
we should affen perhaps to have taker two Cement
a course
mertly reprimanding Howell.
I am therefore inclined to sampend the decision until after
til after the case r Howel
Tatum
ти
д
asking for
C
Forg
civil suit against In Howell; which may or may not bring discredit upon Mr H - but I don't see that wen
justified in taking ally account of this at
T.C.M. 14/1
present].
On the
治
Conta
full
has been decider
refoort
A Br
14/1
other hand
Auggested
mighs mainly rejectin
Luthe
و
от
it
I fear that
Howell
unfernable reis
Cox
.
of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.